Investigation 006
The Fluoride Decision
A quarter of a tooth, and everything it was traded for
Environment & exposure
The most-swallowed drug never prescribed: added to water at 0.7 mg/L, and the contemporary caries benefit measures about a quarter of a tooth.
Investigation 006
A quarter of a tooth, and everything it was traded for
What we are reading
Gathered for the investigation and not yet written up. Each note says what the paper does and does not show.
THE central document and the one almost nobody quotes accurately. 157 studies, ALL non-randomised, every one downgraded for risk of bias. Contemporary evidence (post-1975, i.e. after fluoride toothpaste became universal): starting fluoridation changes dmft by 0.24 teeth (95% CI -0.03 to 0.52) — roughly a QUARTER OF ONE TOOTH, low certainty, and the confidence interval includes no benefit at all. Caries-free children: 4 percentage points (primary), 3 points (permanent), both CIs crossing zero. Cessation: very low certainty, cannot say. No eligible study reports caries outcomes in ADULTS at all. Harms, from the 2015 arm: at 0.7 ppm about 12% have fluorosis of aesthetic concern (95% CI 8-17%, 40 studies, 59,630 people) and about 40% have fluorosis of any level (90 studies, 180,530 people). That is the honest trade — a quarter of a tooth against a two-in-five chance of marking the enamel.
A pro-fluoride narrative review, useful precisely because it concedes the shape of the problem: study heterogeneity, protocol variation, fluorosis, and 'possible neurodevelopmental effects' named as persistent uncertainties. Also the cleanest statement that emerging alternatives — nano-hydroxyapatite, bioactive glass, probiotics — are 'promising but currently supported by limited clinical data'.
Connected on the map
Also in Environment & exposure
The letter
The full citation list for each investigation, the studies that didn't make the episode, and any corrections — sent the morning it publishes.
No sponsors · No supplement affiliates · Unsubscribe any time